<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad: evolution of a revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/</link>
	<description>A blog from South Africa - gadgets, Mac, photography, open source, Lego and anything else worthy of my attention</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:43:31 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: manfred</title>
		<link>http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-109651</link>
		<dc:creator>manfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hertenberger.co.za/?p=6287#comment-109651</guid>
		<description>To be honest, the lack of multi-tasking on the iPhone is often a huge pain: wanting to take a note whilst on a phone call, wanting to quickly paste something from one application to another, etc. Somehow, one is able to cope with the inconvenience, and I think that is Mr Jobs&#039; job: to make things stable, yet flashy, without adding complexity that could damage the overall look and feel of the product. We&#039;re on the same page with the multi-processing concept - I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll expand on this, but only with regard to their own applications and only in certain instances. 

I cannot wait for one of these: currently have a collection of books on the Kindle and a ton of magazines on Zinio that I would love to view on a decent colour screen that is large enough not to require too much scrolling and pinching...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, the lack of multi-tasking on the iPhone is often a huge pain: wanting to take a note whilst on a phone call, wanting to quickly paste something from one application to another, etc. Somehow, one is able to cope with the inconvenience, and I think that is Mr Jobs&#8217; job: to make things stable, yet flashy, without adding complexity that could damage the overall look and feel of the product. We&#8217;re on the same page with the multi-processing concept &#8211; I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll expand on this, but only with regard to their own applications and only in certain instances. </p>
<p>I cannot wait for one of these: currently have a collection of books on the Kindle and a ton of magazines on Zinio that I would love to view on a decent colour screen that is large enough not to require too much scrolling and pinching&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-109645</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hertenberger.co.za/?p=6287#comment-109645</guid>
		<description>I agree about your take on multi-tasking, particularly for the audience that is likely to find the iPad very attractive. I think where it does need to be built in is in apps that have a natural dependency on each other - can I work on a document in iWorks that needs an email or web page to be open at the same time, for example. Is this what you mean by multi-processing?

The average user I know really doesn&#039;t care about being able to stream a radio station while typing a document and doing instant messaging at the same time - their need is for something that just works and looks great while doing so. I&#039;m getting increasingly confident that Apple will scale up to this, and having it available in a device that weighs just 680g and has a 10 hour battery life is enticing. I may just be glad at having deferred that iPhone purchase in favour of something else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about your take on multi-tasking, particularly for the audience that is likely to find the iPad very attractive. I think where it does need to be built in is in apps that have a natural dependency on each other &#8211; can I work on a document in iWorks that needs an email or web page to be open at the same time, for example. Is this what you mean by multi-processing?</p>
<p>The average user I know really doesn&#8217;t care about being able to stream a radio station while typing a document and doing instant messaging at the same time &#8211; their need is for something that just works and looks great while doing so. I&#8217;m getting increasingly confident that Apple will scale up to this, and having it available in a device that weighs just 680g and has a 10 hour battery life is enticing. I may just be glad at having deferred that iPhone purchase in favour of something else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manfred</title>
		<link>http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-109636</link>
		<dc:creator>manfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hertenberger.co.za/?p=6287#comment-109636</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m quite confident that Apple is testing their own, faster processor to migrate that to the iPhone in the future. A faster processor and more memory means that multitasking becomes a possibility, though I&#039;m not sure how Apple feels about positioning that functionality in a market aimed at non-geeks. Regardless how multi-tasking is handled, it always leads to some kind of performance issue, resource leakage, etc. I think we&#039;ll see multi-processing in certain apps, but not necessarily full multi-tasking that allows users to run any combination of programs at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m quite confident that Apple is testing their own, faster processor to migrate that to the iPhone in the future. A faster processor and more memory means that multitasking becomes a possibility, though I&#8217;m not sure how Apple feels about positioning that functionality in a market aimed at non-geeks. Regardless how multi-tasking is handled, it always leads to some kind of performance issue, resource leakage, etc. I think we&#8217;ll see multi-processing in certain apps, but not necessarily full multi-tasking that allows users to run any combination of programs at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://hertenberger.co.za/2010/01/29/ipad-evolution-of-a-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-109405</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hertenberger.co.za/?p=6287#comment-109405</guid>
		<description>I agree with all your comments, this looks like a really attractive device. For all the moaning about it using the iPhone OS, I think the immediate access to the well-stocked App Store is a master stroke. As I see it, most of the complaining comes from very advanced users who either overestimate the requirements of the man in the street or who underestimate Apple&#039;s ability to convince users to change the way they do things.

One thing that I would still like to see would be the introduction of multitasking, which would add even further to the enhanced functionality of this over my iPod Touch - but let&#039;s see what OS 4.0 brings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all your comments, this looks like a really attractive device. For all the moaning about it using the iPhone OS, I think the immediate access to the well-stocked App Store is a master stroke. As I see it, most of the complaining comes from very advanced users who either overestimate the requirements of the man in the street or who underestimate Apple&#8217;s ability to convince users to change the way they do things.</p>
<p>One thing that I would still like to see would be the introduction of multitasking, which would add even further to the enhanced functionality of this over my iPod Touch &#8211; but let&#8217;s see what OS 4.0 brings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
